Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts

Saturday, January 19, 2008

The Pulp of Why So Many Adore Ron Paul

Maybe this is why RP took second in Nevada???



Notice how flippant the others and even the hosts treat this guy.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

Okay, This is the best piece yet!!!

The second half is the most powerful pwning of a Senator in public I have seen in ages.




Honourable Mention -
http://www.youtube.com/v/KrpES1Lk7X4&rel=1

AND THIS ONE IS COOL TOO!!!

http://www.youtube.com/v/t-lxZmrqLxU&rel=1

Saturday, January 05, 2008

I thought Ron Paul Was the Only Cool (R) Out There

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: January 5, 2008
Contact: Fergus Cullen, Chairman, New Hampshire Republican
Party
603-225-9341 office, 603-520-5450 cell


NH REPUBLICAN PARTY WITHDRAWS AS FOX FORUM PARTNER

CONCORD – New Hampshire Republican Party Chairman Fergus Cullen
releases the following statement regarding Sunday’s Republican forum
on FOX:

“The first-in-the-nation New Hampshire primary serves a national
purpose by giving all candidates an equal opportunity on a level
playing field. Only in New Hampshire do lesser known, lesser funded
underdogs have a fighting chance to establish themselves as national
figures. Consistent with that tradition, we believe all recognized
major candidates should have an equal opportunity to participate in
pre-primary debates and forums.

“This principle applies to tonight’s debates on ABC as well as
Sunday’s planned forum on FOX. The New Hampshire Republican Party
believes Congressmen Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter should be included in
the FOX forum on Sunday evening. Our mutual efforts to resolve this
difference have failed.”

“While we understand that FOX News continues to move forward it is
with regret, the New Hampshire Republican Party hereby withdraws as a
partner in this forum.”

_____________________

I must say, that any (R) or (D) that works to support the Constitution are pretty darn cool. I do not mean any (R) or (D) that SAYS they support the Constitution and points to it when running for office, I mean people that use the actual document as a guide when voting.

Also, another interesting political site that rates how honest (HAH!!!) the candidates are. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/

I am this funny even with the writers strike!!!

Sunday, December 09, 2007

Who Really Should be. . . Under Pressure?



Here are the statistics to back what Ron Paul says on Iraq.

FOX Finds Flaw in Frank Field Frackus- "Ron Paul admits to questioning a report by the government".

These ladies at FOX News really got Ron Paul where they want him, admitting he does not automatically believe everything in reports put out by the government. Glad to know that these ladies, and FOX News for that matter, have everyone thinking correctly about anything and everything the government says. Great job ladies, and GREEEEEAT work FOX News!!! Now if we could just get everyone else in America to not question anything put out by the government we will be doing fine.





Best line in this video, "Doesn't Congress have anything better to do than investigate something that, I don't really think is that much in question?"

Most telling line by FOX Talking Head in this video, "This is trouble for the Republican party, I think, having this guy on stage purporting to represent OUR party."

SO the Republican Party is the O'Reilly's Party? Wow!!!

Intel on Iran's Nukes should ruduce American Aggression

Unless the Iranians say something like, "See America, we told you so", or "Hey America, invade this!!!". We will likely not see a nuke dropped in the middle eaast for another few years.

But America has made it clear, if another country with opposing views to ours seeks nuclear weapons we are justified in a first strike. If they only HAVE nukes then we engage in a decades long expensive war of words and chest thumping.

Lord, I hope the Iranians love their children too.

Iran Nuke Intel

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Four Titanics, One Iceberg

Here is an article I wanted to post about Ron Paul's current upswell of support including the online donation of over a million dollars from people all over the country.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

BBC Columnist Covers Debates. Ron Paul Deemed 'Authentic'

Here is a BBC article that covers Ron Paul in a way that better describes him than most other articles I have seen.

Ron Paul is Authentic.
Scott~

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Blackwater Brings Iraqi Govt Limitations to Light

The CNN article link is below and the video is here and an (additional video link is here)-


None of these Blackwater supporters would stand for an outside army to come into America and act as we do in Iraq. Clearly, if a private army of Iraqi soldiers were in America, and they shot randomly into a crowd of people the American government would take them and without habeas corpus hold them, try them, and enforce the law.

So now an American troop of private soldiers in Iraq has shot and killed many non-combatant civilians (all of this captured on video) and the Iraqi government has no authority to respond to this other than to revoke their ability to work in Iraq.

How has the U.S. made the Iraqi government so impotent as to be unable to enforce the law in their own land?

Also, tragically this is not just a Bush administration issue, this type of action has gone on since Clinton and before. Watch the video. I was disappointed to find out how long this thread of abuse has been going on with American taxpayers footing the bill.


Here is the article.

And this article is about how Blackwater focused on cost, not safety of the soldiers. This is why privatizing the military in a corrupted system like ours is not a good idea.

Scott~

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Amazing candidate, amazing compilation



I do not deny that there are a few issues where I disagree with Ron Paul, but where it counts, and on about 95% of the other issues I think he is right on.

He deserves a fair review and all the support anyone that respects the Constitution can give.

Best Wishes to you RP,

Scott~

Monday, August 06, 2007

How to piss off Scott



As someone who has stood behind countless third party candidates of all stripes I know how hard it is to get bodies down to an event to rally support for a low budget candidate.

I recall going to the Guthrie-Cantwell-McGavick debates and there were a TON of Cantwellian supporters and McGavickian supporters all standing on the four corners of one particular intersection outside of the KING~TV studios.

They chanted at each other across the street, 'six more years' over and over, taking breaks to breath after a while of chanting (collective breath takers?) and I happened to be walking right up to them and starting yelling 'six more war, six more wars, six more wars*'.

And after everyone looked around at me with a 'gasp'.

One lady standing near me boldly said, "But we don't want anymore war."

With a warm smile I replied, "I don't either, and that is why I'm voting for Bruce Guthrie."

So here is the EXACT opposite situation. Ron Paul finally gets a large grassroots following to come out and scream his name with passion and love, and look at how ABC portrays the event.

NO WONDER HE IS NOT HIGH IN THE POLLS!!!


HE DOES NOT EXIST!!!


Peace, for the love of God peace,

Scott~


*Honeslty folks, Maria voted for the war and the Bush agenda and Mike was hard core pro Iraq war, so I could not lose.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Ron Paul Visits Google



He has more views than Hillary (scroll to bottom of this page to see how his numbers compare to hers) in a fraction of the time. His support team on the net is growing like wildfire and I am truly amazed.

I respect his message, I respect his solid voting record, and I respect all of those out there that have reached down and supported this guy as he puts the best platform of any (R) and (D) candidate.

Thanks for watching,

Scott~

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Ron Paul Visits Google HQ

Ron Paul made a visit to the main headquarters of google on his campaign trail for President of the United States of America.

A brief review of the visit is here in the article. I wonder why journalists have to include so much of the 'he does not have a chance, but take a minute to humour him.' type attitude when covering someone who is not in the top two of the polls.

Take a read for yourself and comment your thoughts.

Go Ron Go,

Scott~

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Nowhere in the Polls, but Everywhere on the net

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003751285_paul17.html

It has been since the Ross Perot campaign many years ago that I personally got a glimpse of alternative candidates and party structures.

The Reform Party and the Libertarian Party were touted as representing the Constitutional ideals I had been taught in school. Yet the leading papers and politicians often scoffed at or just outright (I first misspelled that as 'pout'right) ignored these alternative or third party candidates. Sometimes I am glad that third party candidates are ignored because quite frankly they do not have it altogether. But this does not excuse the total disregard for what anyone should consider a valid or legitimate campaign.

So all of that aside, forgetting any personal bias of desire for complete coverage, could you hold a 'scientific' poll and include candidates that are not yet declared and exclude candidates that are not only in the race, but getting quite a bit of online buzz?

The LA times has done so and a few others as well.

Here is a video of some polls and ideas being ignored. Tell if you think these are ideas the public of the United states are not interested in!

Read on,

Scott~

___________________

Here is a letter from a friend to the LA TIMES:

From: Regan A.
To: timespoll@latimes.com
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:03:23 AM
Subject: Where's Ron Paul?

Dear Editor,
Pollster, or whomever it may concern,
I recently saw your Republican Primary poll and noticed a glaring omission: Ron Paul was not one of the choices. You listed Fred Thompson (who is not even officially running) but you decide to omit Dr. Paul? You also listed Huckabee who, according to the FEC, has raised less money than Paul in the first quarter of 2007. I have a simple question for you: Why did you do this? Was it just a mistake? If you can give me a satisfactory answer and launch another poll with Paul's name then I will be content. Otherwise, I am prepared to boycott your newspaper because of your unfair coverage of the election. Thank you and have a nice day.

Sincerely,
Regan A
San Diego, CA

_______________________________