I Call Penn Jillette!!!

Glenn Beck has Penn Jillette on his show the other night.

Hmm, strange bedfellows???

This reminds me of the phone call I got from my conservative brother when he said he found himself in a position to vote for a third party when he heard Bob Barr (L).


I have MAD respect for jillette and my folks have a deep fondness for Beck.

FOX: Fair and Balanced??? No!!!

I am truly amazed at the blatant ignoring of Ron Paul ignoring of Ron Paul coming in second place in Nevada.

I swear, if Ron Paul won a state they would only cover who came in second.

I thought Ron Paul Was the Only Cool (R) Out There

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: January 5, 2008
Contact: Fergus Cullen, Chairman, New Hampshire Republican
Party
603-225-9341 office, 603-520-5450 cell


NH REPUBLICAN PARTY WITHDRAWS AS FOX FORUM PARTNER

CONCORD – New Hampshire Republican Party Chairman Fergus Cullen
releases the following statement regarding Sunday’s Republican forum
on FOX:

“The first-in-the-nation New Hampshire primary serves a national
purpose by giving all candidates an equal opportunity on a level
playing field. Only in New Hampshire do lesser known, lesser funded
underdogs have a fighting chance to establish themselves as national
figures. Consistent with that tradition, we believe all recognized
major candidates should have an equal opportunity to participate in
pre-primary debates and forums.

“This principle applies to tonight’s debates on ABC as well as
Sunday’s planned forum on FOX. The New Hampshire Republican Party
believes Congressmen Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter should be included in
the FOX forum on Sunday evening. Our mutual efforts to resolve this
difference have failed.”

“While we understand that FOX News continues to move forward it is
with regret, the New Hampshire Republican Party hereby withdraws as a
partner in this forum.”

_____________________

I must say, that any (R) or (D) that works to support the Constitution are pretty darn cool. I do not mean any (R) or (D) that SAYS they support the Constitution and points to it when running for office, I mean people that use the actual document as a guide when voting.

Also, another interesting political site that rates how honest (HAH!!!) the candidates are. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/

I am this funny even with the writers strike!!!

Who Really Should be. . . Under Pressure?

Here are the statistics to back what Ron Paul says on Iraq.

Intel on Iran's Nukes should ruduce American Aggression

Unless the Iranians say something like, "See America, we told you so", or "Hey America, invade this!!!". We will likely not see a nuke dropped in the middle eaast for another few years.

But America has made it clear, if another country with opposing views to ours seeks nuclear weapons we are justified in a first strike. If they only HAVE nukes then we engage in a decades long expensive war of words and chest thumping.

Lord, I hope the Iranians love their children too.

Iran Nuke Intel

Four Titanics, One Iceberg

Here is an article I wanted to post about Ron Paul's current upswell of support including the online donation of over a million dollars from people all over the country.

Amazing candidate, amazing compilation

I do not deny that there are a few issues where I disagree with Ron Paul, but where it counts, and on about 95% of the other issues I think he is right on.

He deserves a fair review and all the support anyone that respects the Constitution can give.

Best Wishes to you RP,

Scott~

How to piss off Scott

As someone who has stood behind countless third party candidates of all stripes I know how hard it is to get bodies down to an event to rally support for a low budget candidate.

I recall going to the Guthrie-Cantwell-McGavick debates and there were a TON of Cantwellian supporters and McGavickian supporters all standing on the four corners of one particular intersection outside of the KING~TV studios.

They chanted at each other across the street, 'six more years' over and over, taking breaks to breath after a while of chanting (collective breath takers?) and I happened to be walking right up to them and starting yelling 'six more war, six more wars, six more wars*'.

And after everyone looked around at me with a 'gasp'.

One lady standing near me boldly said, "But we don't want anymore war."

With a warm smile I replied, "I don't either, and that is why I'm voting for Bruce Guthrie."

So here is the EXACT opposite situation. Ron Paul finally gets a large grassroots following to come out and scream his name with passion and love, and look at how ABC portrays the event.

NO WONDER HE IS NOT HIGH IN THE POLLS!!!


HE DOES NOT EXIST!!!


Peace, for the love of God peace,

Scott~


*Honeslty folks, Maria voted for the war and the Bush agenda and Mike was hard core pro Iraq war, so I could not lose.

More debate recaps you ask??? Okay!!!

"Ron Paul is Not a Progressive."

I know Ron Paul is not a progressive.

I will amend that. He may want some of the same social programs you want, but he does not want the federal government to be the source of the social programmes.

There is a quote in Russia after they built their socialist govt system, 'we built it then we tripped over it.'

Problem is, if you expect only the government to be the provider of progressive agenda, then you will have to sit idly by as it provides the neo-con agenda with the same authority. We are not going to chisel out the west coast and create a separate state here made up of the blue states, so to get the federal government out of providing your progressive wishlist will keep later (R) Presidents/Congress` from having Halliburton provide sex education, school lunches, and healthcare.

I am a firm believer that a big part of the reasons our communities are falling apart is we keep expecting, even demanding the government to provide everything we want, just because we rename a service as a right. We want healthcare, so it is now a right the the government must provide.

He would not stand in the way of whole communities and whole states creating their own progressive system. He simply wants the fed to stay out of it.

Voluntary Communal Progressive society will only ever succeed by choice of man, never by force of law in an American two party system.

That is in fact the only way any agenda appeals to me. With we the people doing it together by choice NOT forcing a particular view on another.

Naive?

Perhaps, but NOT out of line with the Constitution which we currently still use in the United States.

If my idea is naive, is the contrary progressive or neo-con forced government not equally flawed in it's use of force to impose an unconstitutional agenda?

How to Creat an Angry American

Ron Paul Visits Google HQ

Ron Paul made a visit to the main headquarters of google on his campaign trail for President of the United States of America.

A brief review of the visit is here in the article. I wonder why journalists have to include so much of the 'he does not have a chance, but take a minute to humour him.' type attitude when covering someone who is not in the top two of the polls.

Take a read for yourself and comment your thoughts.

Go Ron Go,

Scott~

Resignation, Impeachment, or Both

This link is for a video of the Olbermann article read by him. you can also read this at the same link.

Olbermann succinctly exposes the serious condition in which the United States of America is constantly, daily crossing the lines into the very types of ruling government that caused rebellion and after much struggle the formation of this nation of laws and protection of individual unalienable rights.

Nowhere in the Polls, but Everywhere on the net

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003751285_paul17.html

It has been since the Ross Perot campaign many years ago that I personally got a glimpse of alternative candidates and party structures.

The Reform Party and the Libertarian Party were touted as representing the Constitutional ideals I had been taught in school. Yet the leading papers and politicians often scoffed at or just outright (I first misspelled that as 'pout'right) ignored these alternative or third party candidates. Sometimes I am glad that third party candidates are ignored because quite frankly they do not have it altogether. But this does not excuse the total disregard for what anyone should consider a valid or legitimate campaign.

So all of that aside, forgetting any personal bias of desire for complete coverage, could you hold a 'scientific' poll and include candidates that are not yet declared and exclude candidates that are not only in the race, but getting quite a bit of online buzz?

The LA times has done so and a few others as well.

Here is a video of some polls and ideas being ignored. Tell if you think these are ideas the public of the United states are not interested in!

Read on,

Scott~

___________________

Here is a letter from a friend to the LA TIMES:

From: Regan A.
To: timespoll@latimes.com
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:03:23 AM
Subject: Where's Ron Paul?

Dear Editor,
Pollster, or whomever it may concern,
I recently saw your Republican Primary poll and noticed a glaring omission: Ron Paul was not one of the choices. You listed Fred Thompson (who is not even officially running) but you decide to omit Dr. Paul? You also listed Huckabee who, according to the FEC, has raised less money than Paul in the first quarter of 2007. I have a simple question for you: Why did you do this? Was it just a mistake? If you can give me a satisfactory answer and launch another poll with Paul's name then I will be content. Otherwise, I am prepared to boycott your newspaper because of your unfair coverage of the election. Thank you and have a nice day.

Sincerely,
Regan A
San Diego, CA

_______________________________

Demand For Ron Paul Grows

Click on the 'Demand For Ron Paul Grows' Title above to demand more Ron Paul in your area!!!

Bill Maher Comes Around

LDS Liberty Blog

This Blog was created to give a sounding board to those who would like to express opinions and ideas about liberty and faith that may apply to these modern days.

There are many of you with various degrees of faith and philosophy, and this will be a sounding board for all who wish to comment on the subject.

Atheists, Agnostics, and faiths of all types are welcome to post. Though this is not the place for hate mail, or unrelated spouting of offensive views. (as rated by a fully informed jury of peers).

To post submissions please submit that request in the comment box or send an e-mail to the one in my profile and I will reply with instructions.

Thank you -

Scott

____________

Update- I have long since changed the subject matter of this blog to be more video and truly more focused on current events instead of just chattin philosophy. But always feel free to post if you'd like, anything about Faith and Liberty.